Title: Did the First Christians Worship Jesus?
Author: James Dunn
Bibliographic Info: 191 pp
Cover: Soft
Publisher: SPCK (2010)
ISBN-10: 0281059284
ISBN-13: 9780281059287
Buy it at Amazon
With thanks to SPCK publishers for the review copy.
As the title suggests, this book is on the issue of whether the earliest Christians did in fact worship Jesus as God. Dunn starts the book off with an introductory overview of early Christology, in which he mentions the notable authors Larry Hurtado and Richard Bauckham. While Dunn says he substantially agrees with both of them on some issues, he wants to make sure that the whole picture of early Christology is being brought into view.
The first chapter tackles the basic, yet tricky, question of what worship means. Dunn takes worship (Greek: proskynein) to imply “the appropriate mode for making a petition to one of high authority who could exercise power to benefit the petitioner” (pg. 10), while not necessarily implying that the person of high authority is also divine. Dunn does recognize a couple of special cases in the New Testament of this word being used of Jesus which move beyond the sense of someone merely acknowledging the authority of Jesus as being higher than their own (e.g. Heb 1:6, Rev 5:14). Dunn also discusses other Greek words for worship (latreuein, epikaleisthai), as well as other words and phrases that denote similar feelings (“blessed is…”, “glorified”, “give thanks to…”, etc).
The following chapter takes this issue of worship a step further by looking at worship in practice. This is done by examining four distinguishing features which worship entailed: 1) Prayer, 2) Hymns, 3) Sacred times, places, and meals, and 4) Cultic Sacrifice. Dunn acknowledges a few places in the New Testament where Paul evidently understood Christ as the one to whom we should pray to. He does not see hymns being sung to Christ (except in Revelation), but rather see’s them (e.g. the Carmen Christi of Philippians) as hymns sung to God praising Him for Christ. Dunn then also discusses the relevance of such things as the Eucharistic meal, the Sunday Sabbath, etc, as being sacred times and meals appropriated for Christ, as well as whether sacrifices were offered to Christ (in a literal or metaphorical manner). He concludes this chapter by saying that the question is not really, “Did the first Christians worship Jesus” (as that is too simplified of a view), but rather, “Was the earliest Christian worship possible without and apart from Jesus?”
That question then leads onto the next chapter. Here, Dunn looks at important types of figures in Jewish literature, such as angels (especially theophanic angels), the Spirit, Wisdom, and Word of God (particularly Philo’s understanding of it). Dunn concludes that the Angel of the Lord, while not being God, brings the real presence of God to us. Furthermore, that there is not hint of worship offered to the Spirit of God, and that Wisdom was not regarded as a semi-divine intermediary, but rather as a way of speaking of God’s activity in creation. The chapter closes with a brief look at exalted patriarchs and their relevance to this topic.
Dunn then spends the next (and final) chapter specifically focused upon Christ. He starts off with asking if Jesus was a monotheist and what this implies, as well as what we can infer about Jesus’ religious beliefs from His upbringing. Then what Paul meant by saying that “Jesus is Lord” is discussed, which includes looking at some select passages from Paul, as well as a special look at Revelation. Dunn also examines how Jesus is described as Wisdom, Word, the Spirit, last Adam, mediator, and heavenly intercessor.
The book ends with an overall conclusion, bibliography and three indices (ancient sources, modern authors, subjects). In the conclusion, Dunn asserts that orthodox Christianity is by and large guilty of “Jesus-olatry.” What Dunn means by this is that instead of offering praise to God the Father through Jesus and in the Spirit, we are offering praise to Jesus. In Dunn’s words, “Jesus is absorbing the worship due to God alone.” (pg. 147). Also, as to the question of the book’s title, Dunn says, “So our central question can indeed be answered negatively, and perhaps it should be.” (pg. 151)
While I am not well enough versed in Christology to offer a thorough critique of what Dunn says, there is one thing that he says which I would like to say something about:
In some ways this is the most difficult issue: that in the New Testament Jesus is sometimes called ‘god’, or should we say ‘God’? If ‘god’, is not that a step towards polytheism – Jesus as a second god beside the creator God? If ‘God’, then how are we to make sense of the first Christians’ clear memory that Jesus called for worship to be given only to God, and himself regularly prayed to God as his God and Father? The data itself poses as many questions as it resolves.
These problems and questions were raised in the early church, and through their interpretation of Scripture alongside the authority of apostolic tradition and teaching, the answer was that God is a triune being!
While I disagree with Dunn’s conclusions, I still appreciated reading this book. He raises interesting questions against Hurtado’s and Bauckham’s ideas of early Christian monotheism and the worship of Jesus. While I do see the New Testament as teaching (elemental) Trinitarianism, there are still one or two passages I have trouble with fitting in that framework (1 Cor 15:24-28 being the primary one).
The only negative about this book I have is that it is a rather small book (with a relatively larger than normal font size). Add to that the fact that there is a decent amount of footnotes, and it leaves me wishing Dunn had put a lot more meat into this book. I think that he could have provided a much deeper conversation with Hurtado and Bauckham.
So what he means to say is that orthodox Christianity is guilty of orthodox Christianity… got it! I’m going to have to give this one a read eventually but I wonder if Dunn has offered anything new or substantially different from previous publications. Do you know if he has?
Pingback: Flotsam and jetsam (5/29) « scientia et sapientia
Nick: I have not read a great deal of Dunn’s work so I couldn’t say whether it is new stuff compared to his previous offerings. Regardless, I would not say that this book offers anything substantially new to the Christological debate in general. While Dunn does refer to Hurtado and Bauckham, he does not interact with them in a huge amount of detail; instead, he just kind of raises some questions about why their arguments might be flawed, provides a piece of reasoning to back it up, and then moves on. I wish the book was longer.
Diglot
Could you give us naive readers a brief summary comparing of the Christologies Dunn, Hurtado and Bauckham.
What denomination or sort of Christianity did you walk away feeling Dunn would identify with?
Sabio: Well, Hurtado and Bauckham hold to the same Christology in the sense that they both believe Jesus was identified with God from very early on. How this is done is where they diverge from one another. (If I am wrong on their views then hopefully someone will correct me).
Bauckham sees the unique identity of God as being characterized by certain roles (i.e. the Creator of all things, the sovereign ruler of all things, etc). He believes that Jesus was identified as God because He was included within this “divine identity” in the New Testament. Hurtado, on the other hand, sees Jesus being identified as God primarily due to “cultic devotion”, that is, people prayed to Jesus, sung hymns to Jesus, baptized in Jesus’ name, etc.
As for Dunn, I could not say what denomination or sort of Christianity I would label him as due to the fact that I am quite unfamiliar with Dunn’s works. Apart from this book, the only other stuff by Dunn I have read is a bunch of articles he wrote. I have not even read his book Christology in the Making (1980). Perhaps someone more versed in Christological matters could explicate on Dunn’s Christology.
Sabio: Hurtado and Bauckham both see Jesus as divine and argue that this belief arose extremely early in the church. Bauckham says that the earliest Christology was the highest Christology because Jesus was included in the “unique divine identity” of YHWH. This unique identity is marked by YHWH’s role as Creator and Sovereign Ruler. Hurtado takes “cultic devotion” as his point of departure and notes how the earliest Christians accorded Jesus the reverence due to God alone. Dunn on the other hand sees a development in Christology in which the latest NT writings exhibit the highest Christologies. The synoptics and Paul do not present Jesus as God and there is no preexistence in them. These views don’t come about until John’s Gospel.
Dunn is a Methodist as far as I’m aware. Hope that helps.
Diglot must have been typing as I was. His descriptions of Bauckham and Hurtado are accurate.
“These problems and questions were raised in the early church, and through their interpretation of Scripture alongside the authority of apostolic tradition and teaching, the answer was that God is a triune being!”
This is a misleading statement. Yes, “christology” was at some point raised in the early church, and yes, it was eventually decided that God is triune. However, the questions were not asked as soon and the answers arrived much later than the statement implies. The lapse between the questions and answers was centuries.
Not exactly convincing that the answer was obvious or logical or widely held by early christians, as I think Dunn seems to be getting at in his book.
Pingback: Did the Early Christians Worship Jesus? « Tazaqqa (تزكي)